https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316676 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Nikolai Kondrashov from comment #9) > Thanks, Jakub! > > Hmm, the .spec file actually specifies GPLv2+. I'm not sure what's happening > here. Could it actually be complaining about install-sh being MIT/X11 > license, which isn't mentioned in the .spec file? > Ooops, I need to apologize, you're right. Sorry, I was going through several specfiles (doing rebuilds of different packages today..) so I must have mixed tlog and another one. tlog correctly specifies GPLv2+ so please ignore my comment and consider that part acked. > Sure, I can put BuildRoot under condition, but I'm not sure which it should > be, could you suggest something? Should I also add its removal to the start > of %install section? I think this can be ignored as well, I check SSSD specfiles and we also have BuildRoot specified even for new branches. So unless Soumya has more comments, I would like to approve the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx