[Bug 1322846] Review Request: SuperLUMT - Single precision real SuperLU routines for shared memory parallel machines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322846



--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> ---
My complaints - 

1/

[?]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 706560 bytes in 2 files.

---> Might I suggest a change here? Please consider moving the license file to
the main package and change the -common subpackage to -doc. I think that makes
the arrangement better.

If you change it to a -doc subpackage, you will need Requires:%{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release} on the sub-packages. Looking at the spec, I think this is
missing already.


2/

[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     SuperLUMT-double , SuperLUMT-complex , SuperLUMT-complex16 ,
     SuperLUMT64 , SuperLUMT64-double , SuperLUMT64-complex ,
     SuperLUMT64-complex16 , SuperLUMT64-devel , SuperLUMT-common ,
     SuperLUMT-debuginfo


---> Please see earlier comment. 

As it stands now, all the sub packages depend on -common and not on the base
pacakge. I think this needs to be changed. If you decide to incorporate the
change I have suggested above, this will also be addressed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]