https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129493 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Flags|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l | |inuxnetz.de) | Last Closed| |2016-04-08 18:41:04 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I'm not absolutely sure if you got the intention of this review request: The pidgin-extras package is actually a copy of the pidgin source RPM that is shipped by RHEL 7, the package thus got a package review before (given the package was taken from Fedora). Further on the changes have been kept as small as possible to hopefully easily rebase on possible pidgin updates in RHEL 7. I'm glad to see that bug #1254778 followed the same intention and got approved for EPEL 7. The "extra" here is to ship "pidgin", the base package, because "pidgin" itself is not in RHEL 7, so %description is right. RHEL 7 only ships some sub-packages of pidgin which makes this a somewhat funny situation. Given "pidgin-epel" is now in EPEL 7 (which is the same approach, but on spec file level slightly different solved), this package review can just be closed. If Matěj is interested, I'm happy to get a co-maintainer, but the package didn't change that much since 2014 as it seems, so less efforts needed :) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1254778 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx