https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092 Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #39 from Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #38) > (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #37) > > Why was this classified as "Not applicable"? I don't see why cryptlib > > shouldn't be shipped separately [2]. Was there a FPC ticket for this > > exception? > > [-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. > > Unless things have changed again, the prohibition on bundled libraries were > completely removed from Fedora but apparently FPR hasn't been updated in > that regard. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries Please note that the policy says: "All packages whose upstreams have no mechanism to build against system libraries must be contacted publicly about a path to supporting system libraries. If upstream refuses, this must be recorded in the spec file using a persistent mechanism to be clarified in the packaging guidelines. " I can see no record of this request in the spec file, or any public question of allowing to unbundle Also, it says that in this case: "The FPC will maintain the list of bundled provides, please consult with them when adding new provides or in case of disputes.". Nor can I see any FPC communication reporting this provides to them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx