[Bug 244951] Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: apr-api-docs - Apache Portable Runtime API documentation


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244951


jorton@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jorton@xxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From jorton@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-25 18:14 EST -------
Per discussion in private mail:

Putting the docs in a noarch.rpm was really the main reason for making this a
separate source package.  As shipped they are arch-specific because they include
macro values - those values are of course implementation details.

I don't think it's a big deal to simply make the package noarch and ignore the
fact that the generated docs will document macro values specific to one arch. 
Ideally the docs are munged to be genuinely arch-neutral.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]