https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308479 --- Comment #7 from Denis Fateyev <denis@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Alessandro Locati from comment #6) > 1. Aren't we in the "When a shared library file is only provided in an > unversioned format, the packager should ask upstream to consider providing a > properly versioned library file. However, in such cases, if the shared > library file is necessary for users to run programs linked against it, it > must go into the base package." case? No. The package already provides versioned libraries (which is the proper behavior), so it's not the case. Programs will be correctly linked against versioned libraries, so everything we need is to move unversioned links to `-devel` subpackage. > 2. Sorry, I don't understand what are you referring to. Can you please link > me the policy where that "BR: make" is explained? For example, https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/497#comment:21 which leads to the current policy on BRs (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires_2), and the diff between two revisions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx