https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092 --- Comment #34 from Ralf Senderek <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #31) > Ok, I think everything has been addressed so the package is: > > *** APPROVED *** > > I'll need to sponsor you formally now. I'm not sure if you have interest > packaging other pieces of software so let me know. I have a few ideas for future packages, but for a couple of days I'll stay with making me familiar with all the new stuff that comes with using SCM. And over time I will work on extending the approved package to other arches as to make it available everywhere. Probably the next step would be to package the external cryptobone, that uses a second linux system to store the encryption keys separately. Then there was the idea of packaging Peter Gutmann's cryptlib as a system library that could generally be used. But this would require some consultation with Peter before I know exactly how to deal with the test suites. But this is definitively on my radar. > Typically I would require > review of other packages before sponsoring but as you are upstream on a > pretty complicated project I was making an exception but I would like to > review the next couple of package reviews you submit. I'd like to contribute to and advance code review of security critical software in the Fedora community. So I looked at the new review requests and did a preliminary check on the git-evtag package ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323214 ) I think I'll follow the developments there first. I'll keep you informed. Thanks again for your assistance and help. Ralf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx