https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322993 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3) > I don't think any of this is blocking... > > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2) > > Issues: > > > > [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > > license(s) for the package is included in %license. > This doesn't apply, because the source package does not include the text of > the license in its own file. > > > [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. > This doesn't apply, the package does not include the license text file. > > > [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > I'll write a mail to the upstream address, but this package hasn't seen > updates recently, so I wouldn't count on this getting fixed quickly. Anyway, > it's a "should", so not blocking. Thanks > > NON blocking issues: > > python2-cma.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > > /usr/share/doc/python2-cma/README.txt > I looked into this before, and the file displays fine in less and on the > terminal. EOLs would only matter if somebody was to edit this file, but they > are not... I don't think there's any need reason to change the EOLs. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review