https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305365 --- Comment #9 from Wolfgang Ulbrich <chat-to-me@xxxxxxxxx> --- >From my point of view the Apache Software License 2.0 is fine, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses But it looks like that upstream has forgotten to add a header to the License in tarball. See APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 I suggest to ask at fedora-legal mailing list if it is really necessary that upstream have to add this header. Rest of the package looks good and i can approve it if this point is clear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review