https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304632 --- Comment #8 from Honggang LI <honli@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neil Horman from comment #6) > [!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). > Is this: > Provides: libibverbs-driver.%{_arch} > Being unversioned and without a driver name attached, it seems useless. It is necessary. All RDMA user space drivers, for example, libcxgb3, libcxgb4, libmlx4, libmlx5 provides this. The libibverbs package dose not provide any specific driver for RDMA HCAs. The corresponding user space drivers, such as, libmlx5 dose. > > ===== EXTRA items ===== > > Generic: > [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > Note: Mock build failed > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint This is an fedora-review tool bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322166#c0 > [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see > attached diff). > See: (this test has no URL) Those files context is identical. But they are in different format. It seems the original spec file had been created in Windows machine. Anyway, I recreated the src file and spec file. honli@dhcp47-85:~/mlx5/rpm$ file libmlx5.spec.download_from_url libmlx5.spec.from_the_src_rpm libmlx5.spec.download_from_url: ASCII text, with CRLF line terminators libmlx5.spec.from_the_src_rpm: ASCII text > /home/nhorman/1304632-libmlx5/results/libmlx5-debuginfo-1.0.2-2.fc25.x86_64. > rpm > /home/nhorman/1304632-libmlx5/results/libmlx5-debuginfo-1.0.2-2.fc25.x86_64. > rpm As you see, duplicated debuginfo packages. > ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. > I think if you fix up that Provides, or explain it, we will be good to go. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review