[Bug 245501] Review Request: perl-Test-Number-Delta - Compare the difference between numbers against a given tolerance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Number-Delta - Compare the difference between numbers against a given tolerance


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245501


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-25 01:13 EST -------
Sorry about the delay; a storm took out my Internet connection for a while.

* source files match upstream:
   9cd18d89bde4333f9f9b77668ef03e6e20d8ee5675c2ab1b216c7323419a320e  
   Test-Number-Delta-1.03.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64)
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Test::Number::Delta) = 1.03
   perl-Test-Number-Delta = 1.03-1.fc8
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(Exporter)
   perl(Test::Builder)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=13, Tests=69,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.48 cusr +  0.20 csys =  0.68 CPU)
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.  (Heck, the 
   license file alone is bigger than the rest of the package.)
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]