https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440 --- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3) > The name looks weird to me. Why is it needed to use compat in the package > name? Simply use %{pkgname}43 as the package name (without any dash). The digits inside the name should be enough to show it's a compat package. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#CommonCharacterSet Maybe you'd look also into package renaming guideline. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages -- Please move 'make -C TESTING' into (new) %check. We do not want to build tests with rpmbuild --nocheck . Why is there no license text file with %license ? Please poke upstream to clear what BSD version we have here. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text Last, a general advice to generally use macros where possible. - URL: http://crd-legacy.lbl.gov/~xiaoye/SuperLU/ - Source0: http://crd-legacy.lbl.gov/~xiaoye/SuperLU/%{archname}_%{version}.tar.gz URL: http://crd-legacy.lbl.gov/~xiaoye/%{pkgname} Source0: %{url}/%{archname}_%{version}.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review