https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE.txt is marked as %doc instead of %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text + license is acceptable (OFL) + license file is present + version is recent (git snapshot) + provides/requires look OK + font packaging guidelines are followed One question: why do you add separate otf, ttf subdirs? Other font packages don't do that afaics. There's a problem with directory ownership too: No known owner of /usr/share/fonts/julietaula-montserrat/otf, /usr/share/fonts/julietaula-montserrat/ttf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review