https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650 jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #15) > (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14) > … > > Are you able to run the demos? > > Running samples.addressbook.model.AddressBookTest > Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.156 sec - > in samples.addressbook.model.AddressBookTest > > Running samples.calculator.CalculatorTest > Tests run: 23, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.713 sec - > in samples.calculator.CalculatorTest > > (from build.log) Ok. I overlooked that. sorry. I still think that the this package need versioning and licensing pressure to upstream. > RTFM, honestly. Although I agree that my issues except (*not* obvious) typo in license, were more related to usptream then to package itself, responsibility of each review is to ensure that no garbage goes to fedora. Considering that after review, it moreover one man show with a lot of freedom, then after the review the package more degrade then anything else. Anyway package is APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review