https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308985 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the information, Adam - this is precisely the sort of thing that should be raised and documented during package review, and is why I objected to Igor's non-existant (or at least undocumented) review and instant approval. So, I think we agree that normal practice for unversioned shared objects which are not intended to be used as system libraries (and so not directly linked against) is to place them outside the ld library paths or cache, and the guidelines allow these to not be put in a -devel sub-package. So, I agree, they don't need to be in a -devel, and they don't need to be versioned. However, I haven't seen a good argument for not putting them under/usr/lib[64]/vulkan ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review