https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685 --- Comment #33 from Ranjan Maitra <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx> --- Perhaps I misunderstood your comments, but here are the changes that were made in response to #29. > .so is packaged in both subpackages. It should be present only in the -devel supbackage. Common trick is to %{_libdir}/libsylfilter.so.* in the main subpackage. In the spec file: I did (see in particular the fifth line from here): .... %files %doc README %{_bindir}/sylfilter %{_libdir}/libsylfilter.* %{_libdir}/libsylfilter.so.* %license COPYING %files devel %{_libdir}/libsylfilter.so %{_includedir}/sylfilter > You should move the Requires tag above %description because they're being interpreted as the part of the text. My spec file now goes like this: %package devel Summary: Development files for sylfilter Requires: sylfilter%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} %description devel Development files for sylfilter Requires: sqlite-devel Requires: glib2-devel %description This is SylFilter, a generic message filter library, and some command-line tools that provide a Bayesian filter which is very popular as a spam filtering algorithm. Is this not what was suggested? Many thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review