https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #29 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint is quite helpful: sylfilter.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsylfilter.so .so is packaged in both subpackages. It should be present only in the -devel supbackage. Common trick is to %{_libdir}/libsylfilter.so.* in the main subpackage. sylfilter-devel.i686: W: tag-in-description C Requires: sylfilter-devel.i686: W: tag-in-description C Requires: You should move the Requires tag above %description because they're being interpreted as the part of the text. /usr/lib/libsylfilter.la should be removed after installation [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#StaticLibraries]. I looked over all the other comments, and it seems everything that other reviews noted was fixed. It looks very clean now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review