https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317345 Bug ID: 1317345 Summary: Review Request: erlang-luerl - Lua in Erlang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: rbarlow@xxxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-luerl.spec SRPM URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-luerl-0-20151209.9524d030.1.fc25.src.rpm Description: An experimental implementation of Lua 5.2 written solely in pure Erlang. Fedora Account System Username: rbarlow This is the output of rpmlint on the generated RPM: erlang-luerl.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Lua -> Lu, La, Luna erlang-luerl.x86_64: E: no-binary erlang-luerl.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib erlang-luerl.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/erlang-luerl/examples/hello/hello2-3.lua 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. The no-binary error is normal for Erlang packages, as is the only-non-binary-in-usr-lib. I don't think we need to worry about the encoding on the example code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review