https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305365 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- ISSUES: [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1305365-concurrentunit/licensecheck.txt Source files are missing license headers. Would you please contact upstream to fix it? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification concurrentunit-concurrentunit-0.4.2/src/main/java/net/jodah/concurrentunit/ConcurrentTestCase.java concurrentunit-concurrentunit-0.4.2/src/main/java/net/jodah/concurrentunit/Waiter.java concurrentunit-concurrentunit-0.4.2/src/main/java/net/jodah/concurrentunit/internal/ReentrantCircuit.java NON blocking issues: [?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. if you remove <optional>true</optional> you don't need to add Requires: hamcrest concurrentunit.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/concurrentunit/README.md -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review