https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315307 --- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - bsdtar3 and bsdcpio3 must require main package, all arch-ed: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} ==== Additional issue ===== - Library and binary files are No RELRO and with PIE disabled. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* Public domain", "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2 clause)". 32 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/sagitter/FedoraReview/1315307-libarchive3/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 153600 bytes in 9 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in bsdtar3 , bsdcpio3 , libarchive3-debuginfo [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: libarchive3-3.1.2-1.el6.x86_64.rpm libarchive3-devel-3.1.2-1.el6.x86_64.rpm bsdtar3-3.1.2-1.el6.x86_64.rpm bsdcpio3-3.1.2-1.el6.x86_64.rpm libarchive3-debuginfo-3.1.2-1.el6.x86_64.rpm libarchive3-3.1.2-1.el6.src.rpm libarchive3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Libarchive -> Lib archive, Lib-archive, Archive libarchive3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI libarchive3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ar -> AR, Ar, at libarchive3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shar -> share, shear, shard libarchive3.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libarchive.so.13.1.2 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 libarchive3-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bsdtar3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsdtar -> bastard bsdtar3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive bsdcpio3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bsdcpio bsdcpio3.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive libarchive3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Libarchive -> Lib archive, Lib-archive, Archive libarchive3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI libarchive3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ar -> AR, Ar, at libarchive3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shar -> share, shear, shard 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: libarchive3-debuginfo-3.1.2-1.el6.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format error: cannot open Name index using db3 - Invalid argument (22) rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format (none): E: error while reading libarchive3-devel: 'libarchive3-devel' rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format (none): E: error while reading bsdcpio3: 'bsdcpio3' rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format (none): E: error while reading libarchive3-debuginfo: 'libarchive3-debuginfo' rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format (none): E: error while reading bsdtar3: 'bsdtar3' rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format (none): E: error while reading libarchive3: 'libarchive3' 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Requires -------- libarchive3-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libarchive.so.13()(64bit) libarchive3(x86-64) bsdcpio3 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libacl.so.1()(64bit) libarchive.so.13()(64bit) libarchive3 libattr.so.1()(64bit) libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) liblzma.so.0()(64bit) liblzo2.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libarchive3-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): bsdtar3 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libacl.so.1()(64bit) libarchive.so.13()(64bit) libarchive3 libattr.so.1()(64bit) libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) liblzma.so.0()(64bit) liblzo2.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libarchive3 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libacl.so.1()(64bit) libacl.so.1(ACL_1.0)(64bit) libarchive.so.13()(64bit) libattr.so.1()(64bit) libattr.so.1(ATTR_1.0)(64bit) libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10()(64bit) libcrypto.so.10(libcrypto.so.10)(64bit) liblzma.so.0()(64bit) liblzo2.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.5.0)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.5.2)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0)(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.5)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- libarchive3-devel: libarchive3-devel libarchive3-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(libarchive3) bsdcpio3: bsdcpio3 bsdcpio3(x86-64) libarchive3-debuginfo: libarchive3-debuginfo libarchive3-debuginfo(x86-64) bsdtar3: bsdtar3 bsdtar3(x86-64) libarchive3: libarchive.so.13()(64bit) libarchive3 libarchive3(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- http://www.libarchive.org/downloads/libarchive-3.1.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : eb87eacd8fe49e8d90c8fdc189813023ccc319c5e752b01fb6ad0cc7b2c53d5e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : eb87eacd8fe49e8d90c8fdc189813023ccc319c5e752b01fb6ad0cc7b2c53d5e Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (7737a2a) last change: 2015-11-26 Command line :./try-fedora-review -m epel-6-x86_64 --plugins EPEL6:on -b 1315307 Buildroot used: epel-6-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review