https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308986 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #1) > Minor comment: is "anvil" an appropriate name for this package? It doesn't > install anything that users will refer to by name, and it will (IIUC) be > obsoleted by a future mesa update at some point. The driver refers to itself as anvil. Even when it is merged into mesa, it will likely still be subpackaged separately from the GL drivers. > How about "vulkan-driver-intel"? How about doing that as a virtual Provide, and adding a Recommends: for that from the vulkan library package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review