Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 ------- Additional Comments From mpg@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-21 14:37 EST ------- >So is this going to be usable for the other apps in fedora that currently >BuildRequire: firefox-devel ? The current plan is to build it only on OLPC-2. Not sure what are caillon plans for Fedora. It could be used that way potentially (keep in mind this is just a pre release though). > What olpc apps currently link static to this package? Hulahop links statically, sugar use hulahop python bindings. >Your version is slightly wrong... the 'cvs' should be at the end... >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a >and there should be another digit there I think. Thanks, I'll fix it before importing. >Since you are using a cvs checkout, can you include a comment on how to check >that exact version out ? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL We have a tarball on dev.laptop.org, is adding that as URL ok? http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/xulrunner-1.9a5pre-cvs20070519.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review