https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295456 --- Comment #8 from William Moreno <williamjmorenor@xxxxxxxxx> --- The package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK The License field match the actual license OK The spec file must be written in American English OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK The package build in rawhide OK BuildRequires OK No bundled libraries OK Directories ownership OK Permissions on files OK Consistently use macros OK Source is code nor binary OK Need work: The text of the license must be included in %license. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. There is a sphinx doc than you can build and include as subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review