[Bug 1064657] Review Request: exciting - FP-LAPW Code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657

Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #19 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> ---

> > 
> > - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
> >   in the spec URL.
> >   Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in
> >   /home/mukundan/ownCloud/misc_pkgs/pkg_reviews/1064657-exciting/diff.txt
> >   See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
> > 
> 
> I think this happens when a SRPM created on EL6 is unpacked on a newer
> Fedora by koji.
> I don't see any version mismatch with `cmp`.
> 
> > 

$ sha256sum exciting.boron-10.tar.gz dl/exciting.boron-10.tar.gz 
8112605a9f3e1ea693c2638fd45fbcf87885aa96d74683335a06909e349a0bfc 
exciting.boron-10.tar.gz
8112605a9f3e1ea693c2638fd45fbcf87885aa96d74683335a06909e349a0bfc 
dl/exciting.boron-10.tar.gz


cmp also produces nothing as you mentioned.

---> This is done.

---> Licensing - done! (see c#18)

---> spec file diffs - I do not see any problems. Koji builds look good to me.

I have nothing else to complain about.

Package APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]