https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334 --- Comment #14 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to José Matos from comment #8) > (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #5) > > I did *not* want it to be labeled as %doc. > > > > What I meant to say was "fedora-review warning was bogus". It was clear to > > me when I wrote that comment. But, as I read it now, I realize how it > > sounds! :( > > I am sorry if I sound it otherwise, my comment was meant to be constructive. > :-) > > And we all know how written communication is poor medium at conveying > information. > > With that said I would like to thank you for addressing this review since > R-cpp is a direct dependency of more than 500 R packages and some of my R > packages are starting to depend on it. So I am glad that this is going > forward. :-D No worries. Certainly appreciate the input! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review