https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294852 --- Comment #6 from Pier Luigi Fiorini <pierluigi.fiorini@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Pier Luigi, I don't think this way of conducting reviews are acceptable. You do > them in a too simplified way. > > You should follow the entire checklist on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ReviewGuidelines or you can use fedora-review tool to automate that. For simplicity I didn't put all the review check list items in the report here. Thanks for suggesting fedora-review. > For example, in this review the .src.rpm file refers to libksane-15.12.0 while > the .spec file is for libksane-15.12.1 and using fedora-review the check fails. That was changed after I picked up the review but didn't come to my mind to download the files again. Next time I'll be more accurate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review