https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882 --- Comment #31 from awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> --- "/var/lib/openqa/share/factory/iso is not %ghosted, on purpose?" Yeah, I kinda go back and forward on that one. It's somewhat different because the upstream Makefile actually installs it and it's more or less mandatory (you can run all your tests from disk images, I *guess*, but it'd be a very odd use of openQA). The other asset types are more optional (a simple config might not have any of them). I like the trigger idea, I guess, Ludwig, WDYT? I guess I'd only question whether it'll work once we write an SELinux policy for openQA (which I'm planning to do). I'll look into the errors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review