https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882 --- Comment #23 from Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@xxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #13) > > "Strictly speaking, the generator is wrong, because generators cannot rely > > on /var being mounted. It will not operate correctly if someone has a system > > with separate /var partitions." > > > > Is there a fix or change you can recommend? Honestly this just came from the > > SUSE spec, I don't even know what it does. > > It adds openqa-worker@.service instance for every item in > /var/lib/openqa/pool/[0-9]* to the openqa-worker.target. The annoying thing > is that things will break in a confusing way if /var is separate: after > initial installation things will be fine, and then after a reboot the units > will not be generated as expected. But maybe that's not that much of a > problem, after all this package will not be installed by too many random > people. The generator was an attempt to make things more convenient, so one doesn't have to configure the number of workers explicitly. It's true that it doesn't work in all deployment scenarios (we use tmpfs for the pool for example where it also doesn't work). If it didn't achieve that goal we may just as well drop it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review