[Bug 1300070] Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070

Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #26 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Colin Macdonald from comment #24)
> Thank you for the review!
> 
> 1.  I hope I have addressed your comments, except for the rpmlint warnings:
> 
> >> octave-doctest.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> 
> Noted above: all doc files are needed for package to function correctly thus
> not marked %doc.
> 
> >> octave-doctest.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun mv
> 
> I think this is from the .macro file
> 
> 
> 2.  I don't really understand the __exclude_exclude: in particular, is it
> correct to place it at the top of the file?
> 

It's provided for by guidelines for Octave packages: 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Octave#Arch_specific_Octave_spec_template

> 
> 3.  Updated files:
> 
> Spec URL: https://cbm.fedorapeople.org/octave-doctest.spec
> SRPM URL: https://cbm.fedorapeople.org/octave-doctest-0.4.1-3.fc23.src.rpm
> 
> 

Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]