https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303569 Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen.nitdgp@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen.nitdgp@xxxxxxxxx> --- Yes, rpmlint is not showing this warning now and source checksum also correct. Rpmlint ------- Checking: uflash-0.9.18b0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm uflash-0.9.18b0-1.fc23.src.rpm uflash.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment uflash.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programatically -> grammatically, problematically, pragmatically uflash.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary uflash uflash.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment uflash.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programatically -> grammatically, problematically, pragmatically 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/u/uflash/uflash-0.9.18b0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 876e427812530a14a1b662213343aca2c65e58b7e9bcf6d1625f0f1c317b6e1a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 876e427812530a14a1b662213343aca2c65e58b7e9bcf6d1625f0f1c317b6e1a ================ Approved ================== -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review