https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301589 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I have tested on Fedora 23. Directory owning should be addressed here then. > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in super-csv- > benchmark, super-csv-dozer, super-csv-java8, super-csv-joda, super-csv-parent, > super-csv-javadoc No, it does not happened. Please look at review requires above. And it easy to check, f.e. super-csv-benchmark easy installed without super-csv: $ rpm -qa 'super-csv*' [empty] $ sudo rpm -Uh super-csv-benchmark-2.4.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm $ rpm -qa 'super-csv*' super-csv-benchmark-2.4.0-1.fc22.noarch > These a maven build style and %check section is unnecessary Yes. It should, not must item: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Test_Suites But strongly recommended if upstream include tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review