https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303434 Bug ID: 1303434 Summary: Review Request: erlang-p1_sip - ProcessOne SIP server component in Erlang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rbarlow@xxxxxxxxxx Blocks: 1204119 Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/erlang-p1_sip.spec SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/erlang-p1_sip-1.0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: ProcessOne SIP server component in Erlang. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12760905 There are a few rpmlint issues: Rpmlint ------- Checking: erlang-p1_sip-1.0.0-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm erlang-p1_sip-1.0.0-1.fc24.src.rpm erlang-p1_sip.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/p1_sip-1.0.0/priv/esip_drv.so erlang-p1_sip.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/p1_sip-1.0.0/include/esip.hrl erlang-p1_sip.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/p1_sip-1.0.0/include/esip_lib.hrl erlang-p1_sip.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/erlang-p1_sip/COPYING 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. The Erlang convention is to not strip binaries. The license in upstream's master branch is ASL 2.0 so the incorrect FSF address can't be reported to upstream. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204119 [Bug 1204119] ejabberd-16.01 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review