https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz <claudiorodrigo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(claudiorodrigo@pe | |reyradiaz.com.ar) | --- Comment #19 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz <claudiorodrigo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #18) > OpenRA moved to Open.NAT and obsoletes Mono.NAT, upstream is dead anyways. I > doubt there's any sense to continue with this review? I see that Mono.NAT is still alive. Few minor changes but alive. Also is under mono umbrella on github I thing that will be good have Mono.NAT and Open.NAT into Fedora. Like other fork projects. Open.Nat have a different focus in some features. See http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/807861/Open-NAT-A-NAT-Traversal-library-for-NET-and-Mono#Open.NAT%20and%20Mono.Nat If you want open a new review for Open.Nat I will check it to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review