https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I don't know if the license matters here: MIT could also be a option though traditionally we have defaulted to GPLv2+ for these kind of packages. I hope we don't need to ship any COPYING file. Anyone know any other metapackages in Fedora? Overall the package looks fine to me. I think the only discussion point currently is how many or rather what locales to split out. I think pt_PT might be better than pt, and also bn_BD than bn. Not sure if en_GB is really needed at this point, but again it depends on how much we decide to split up the langs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review