https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297622 Randy Barlow <rbarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |admiller@xxxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(admiller@redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Randy Barlow <rbarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello Adam! I believe that the first issue (about not owning the folders) was due to Pulp platform not having been in Fedora at the time of your review yet. When I run fedora-review now that Pulp is in Fedora, I do not see those errors. I removed the defattr statements, and used attr instead in the one place it was needed. "Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable." There is not actually a package called pulp-docker, so I don't think it makes sense for the subpackages to depend on pulp-docker. Do you agree? I've gone ahead and packaged a 0.3.beta from upstream that was released this week and fixed the defattr thing: Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/pulp-docker.spec SRPM URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/pulp-docker-2.0.0-0.3.beta.1.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review