https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300569 Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jsilhan@xxxxxxxxxx, | |mfabian@xxxxxxxxxx Blocks| |1238406 Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |petersen@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Okay I'm thinking now after all it may be better to name this "langpacks" rather than "langpack" as you originally had planned since typically the meta packages will cause more than one langpack to be installed for a language (and consistency with [1]), including the glibc locale (planned for F24 [2]). (On the other hand langpack is more consistent with *-langpack-* [3], but linguistically probably "langpacks-*" makes more sense for this package.) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Langpack [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/ChangeSet#Glibc_locale_subpackaging [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:PackagingDrafts/Langpack Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238406 [Bug 1238406] Glibc locale subpackaging -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review