[Bug 234830] Review Request: audacious-show - XChat plugin for audacious

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: audacious-show - XChat plugin for audacious


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234830





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx  2007-06-19 23:39 EST -------
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===

 [ ? ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [ ? ] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}
 [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [ OK ] Package successfully compiles and builds.
 [ Ok ] Mock built on x86_64 (F-7, devel).
 [ Ok ] Package is not relocatable.
 [ Ok ] Buildroot is correct
 [ Ok ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license.
 [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 [ Ok ] License type: GPL
 [ OK ] License text is included in package.
 [ Ok ] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
 [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [ SKIP ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [ OK ] Package has a %clean section.
 [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros.
 [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [ SKIP ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file.
 [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 [ CHECK ] Requires:
hicolor-icon-theme libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit)
libQtXml.so.4()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXtst.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)


== Rpmlint output: ==
 
 [ OK ] Silent on both.


=== some comments ===

* you can easly export and set your variable by one line in spec file as follow:
export CFLAGS="RPM_OPT_FLAGS"

* 'bout package naming.
As this package is a plugin of x-chat, the package name should be renaming to
follow all plugins packages naming.
So your package name should look like this:
x-chat-audacious-show or x-chat-audacious instead of just audacious.

* INSTALL file should be removed from %doc.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]