Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-show - XChat plugin for audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234830 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-06-19 23:39 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ ? ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ? ] Spec file name must match the base package %{name} [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully compiles and builds. [ Ok ] Mock built on x86_64 (F-7, devel). [ Ok ] Package is not relocatable. [ Ok ] Buildroot is correct [ Ok ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ OK ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ Ok ] License type: GPL [ OK ] License text is included in package. [ Ok ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ SKIP ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [ CHECK ] Requires: hicolor-icon-theme libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libQtXml.so.4()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXtst.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) == Rpmlint output: == [ OK ] Silent on both. === some comments === * you can easly export and set your variable by one line in spec file as follow: export CFLAGS="RPM_OPT_FLAGS" * 'bout package naming. As this package is a plugin of x-chat, the package name should be renaming to follow all plugins packages naming. So your package name should look like this: x-chat-audacious-show or x-chat-audacious instead of just audacious. * INSTALL file should be removed from %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review