https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #21 from Julien Enselme <jujens@xxxxxxxxx> --- > SRPM url incorrect. Sorry about that. > It is very bad practice make changes without touch changelog and bump version (release). And until it is not imported in Fedora I look at that now. But please, do not do such in the future. I know it is a bad practice. Since the package is not yet imported, I did it to avoid creating a changelog entry for a silly mistake. I would never have done that on an imported package. > Why you direct run tests instead of use recommended %{__python2} setup.py test? In this case (as with some other packages) running %{__python2} setup.py test doesn't discover test because of missing information about tests in the setup.py file. In such cases, I found that using pytest is an easy way out. If it causes problem with the package, I will change it. > If you provide binaries with version suffixes in both packages python 2 package must contain one without suffix Indeed. SPEC: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-recommonmark.spec SRPM: http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-recommonmark-0.4.0-4.git7ca5247.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review