https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #14) > > According to logs its at least does not fail: > > + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test > > But according to the logs, it doesn't launch any tests. > According to the logs, it happened when you tried to launch the tests with > setup.py. Your previous build worked and I just tested with fedora-review > and encountered no problem. Does run nothing but require addition dependency? :) docutil mentioned as dep even in setup.py from pupi tarball. > And since there is not tag nor release on github (https://github.com/rtfd/recommonmark), I cannot take the source from github. For 0.4.0 there isn't even a commit telling me which revision to take. So I think I'm stuck with sources from pypi. First is very easy way. You may not search point when such tarball was created, but include current master state following post-release naming scheme: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages I have not see sense to do that, but if you want provide exactly 0.4.0 commit it very easy to find for that project as it have small amount of commits: It is https://github.com/rtfd/recommonmark/commit/7ca5247b342e755ce5294d43b5fef68afd90028e where version was bumped. Next commit https://github.com/rtfd/recommonmark/commit/06bf23745e83abf1161b369046c6a38f2ee3fa93 in file which is not in pupi tarball at all, and next one absent: https://github.com/rtfd/recommonmark/commit/d0560b1693a3e5641524daab331a1a2f66a76f68 So, 7ca5247b342e755ce5294d43b5fef68afd90028e is what you look for. Even it include tests and license file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review