https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966 --- Comment #49 from Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #47) > If the go code is shipped in the rkt binary or src package, then the license > file needs to be in that binary or src package. > > This means that if you may have code which is only used at build-time but > not packaged into the rkt binary rpm, then you only need to make sure the > license text is in the src.rpm. However, this is rare, and most people > simply include the license texts in the binary rpm to be safe (as %license). Thanks spot, we're not shipping the sources for now, so I think we're fine. I'll include licenses once we ship -devel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review