https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) | --- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Using a comment to declare the license on a spec file to be GPLv3+ is perfectly acceptable. The intent of the FPCA is to provide a blanket default license for all contributed works (including spec files) where the contributor does not specify a license. Since you've specified a license, this does not apply. Your choice of license (GPLv3+) is perfectly acceptable to Fedora. Lifting FE-Legal. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review