[Bug 812758] Review Request: trader - Star Traders, a simple game of interstellar trading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758



--- Comment #20 from John Zaitseff <J.Zaitseff@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #17)
> # This file is distributed under the same licence as Star Traders itself:
> # the GNU General Public License, version 3 or later.
> 
> Not, you can not, specs are software for the FPCA
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:
> Fedora_Project_Contributor_Agreement?rd=Legal:FPCA
> 
> "Code" means (i) software code, (ii) any other functional material whose
> principal purpose is to control or facilitate the building of packages, such
> as an RPM spec file, (iii) font files, and (iv) other kinds of copyrightable
> material that the Fedora Council has classified as "code" rather than
> "content".

I am not quite sure what your point is here.  I am the author of both the
software package (Star Traders) and (at least for current versions) the SPEC
file as well.  All I aim in making the statement "This file is distributed..."
is to make the SPEC file be under the GPL 3+.  It is a declarative statement in
English: essentially, "I choose that this file is distributed under...".

My reading of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing
suggests that I can license the SPEC file under an explicit licence, in this
case GPL 3+: it is only if I don't that the SPEC file comes under the MIT
licence.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]