[Bug 1288731] Review Request: os-autoinst - OS-level test automation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288731



--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx from comment #11)
> "/usr/libexec/os-autoinst → shouldn't this be in
> /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl"
> 
> That would be an upstream decision really (upstream explicitly installs to
> libexecdir), but I think for one thing os-autoinst is not intended to be
> used as a vendor module. If you want to ask upstream I can hook you up with
> them...
> 
> "/var/lib/os-autoinst/audio/aplay-1.wav → shouldn't this be
> /usr/share/os-autoinst?"
> 
> possibly? I don't actually know what it's for. Again, though, if that's
> going to change it would make the most sense to patch upstream's install
> routine, I much prefer that to relocating things in downstream packages.

Neither is a big deal, but at least the second one is a FHS violation.
It's not a big file, so if you tell me that it would be more than a
small amount of work or otherwise problematic to move (e.g. because that's
the upstream documented path), then I'm fine with leaving it as is.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]