https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294211 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/marble-widget/marble-widget.spec https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/marble-widget/marble-widget-15.08.3-51.fc23.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Jan 10 2016 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 1:15.08.3-51 - %%license LICENSE.txt - remove reference to unused marble-data subpkg - -devel: Conflicts: marble-widget-qt5-devel - update URL, simplify Source0 URL For remaining questions: - Do we expect upstream to accept still those patches for the qt4 branch? I have upstream commit access and strictly the older branches are not closed, but since there's going to be no new releases based on this branch, upstreaming anything isn't very helpful. - Maybe add a comment about the discontinued qt4 branch a .spec comment? Maybe for posterity, but our current maintainers are well aware of the situation. - Subpackage widget-data exists in both marble-widget.spec and marble.spec files. How to difference between both with different versions (15.08.3 vs. 15.12.0)? Do you really want to name it marble-widget-widget-data (mind twice widget) in case of marble-widget.spec? That can not work with Requires: %{name}-data . There's no %files widget-data in marble-widget.spec, so I guess it's just a copy-paste error somehow? This package does not produce any widget-data subpkg, but there was an extraneous %package widget-data reference which is now removed. - Why exclude astro as it has been activated in the old subpackage from marble.spec? Is that a plugin and now obsolete? Using system astro (from main marble package), see BuildRequires: marble-astro-devel - The mobile switch gets turned ON in marble-widget.spec but it was OFF in marble.spec? All apps are already disabled from building, no need to explicitly exlude it (again). We're only building libmarble -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review