https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- You should use %license for COPYING.md [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text]. Spec file name does not match srpm file name (it's missing the dash). Please add an empty build section: %build # nothing to do Add a dot at the end of both %description's. -- It would be great if you could do two-three reviews of other packages (e.g. anything from https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html), so that potential sponsors know that you know the packaging guidelines and review workflow. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines and the fedora-review tool are very useful. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review