Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keepassx - Cross-platform password manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231114 lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-06-18 23:19 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Build at least one arch: Mock built on x86_64 (F-7, Devel) [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [ Ok ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ Ok ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ Ok ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ OK ] License type: GPL [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires and aren't redundant. [ OK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ OK ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ OK ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ SKIP ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ Ok ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ OK ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package contains a properly installed desktop file association. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [ Ok ] Scriplets are properly set. [ OK ] scriptlets for mime type are present. [ OK ] scriptlets for icon-cache are present [ CHECK ] Requires: hicolor-icon-theme libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libQtXml.so.4()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXtst.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) == Rpmlint output: == [ OK ] Silent on both, RPM and SRPM files. ============== ** APPROVED ** ============== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review