[Bug 1295549] Review Request: qt5-qtwebengine - Qt5 - QtWebEngine components

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295549



--- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I've just noticed that the License tag is incomplete. Spot's chromium.spec has
this:
License: BSD and LGPLv2+ and ASL 2.0 and IJG and MIT and GPLv2+ and ISC and
OpenSSL and (MPLv1.1 or GPLv2 or LGPLv2)
which is closer to the truth. We don't build with OpenSSL though, and of course
we have to add the License of Qt's parts, so the License should be something
like:
License: (LGPLv2 with exceptions or GPLv3 with exceptions) and BSD and LGPLv2+
and ASL 2.0 and IJG and MIT and GPLv2+ and ISC and (MPLv1.1 or GPLv2 or LGPLv2)
I'll fix it in the next build.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]