https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157255 --- Comment #12 from Karel Volný <kvolny@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11) > Your ufoai-data package spec is missing the %{?dist} tag in the Release > field (like how the ufoai package spec has it). originally that was done on purpose, not to duplicate the same data in buildsys and on mirrors > @Karel, it seems your email got moderated out of Fedora Legal, as I don't > see it in the archives[0]. it seems that the archives are broken (or just late?) as I don't see anything for this January while I've already received my e-mail back from the list and also an answer from Dmitry Alexandrov note that I also do not see any 2016's messages on e.g. test-list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/ the archive for December suggests that it stopped on Christmas: Starting: Sun Nov 1 03:04:30 UTC 2015 Ending: Mon Nov 23 01:00:31 UTC 2015 > The Umefont license[1] appears to be an extremely permissive license, so I > don't expect it to be a problem, but that said, this font license question > does need to be answered, so I'm setting FE-Legal to block it. well, the only problem now is that I cannot find *that much* permissive licence on the list of approved Dmitry suggested that it might be substituted with CopyrightOnly [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:CopyrightOnly] The page says "You don't have to list this if you don't want to." which would probably apply here too, but not listing any license in the spec is considered blocker these days if I recall correctly ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review