https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289726 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ville.skytta@xxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |ville.skytta@xxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> --- All *.txt are installed as executable. All summaries are quite weak, they pretty much just repeat the package's name. Most subpackage descriptions have the same issue as the summaries. Are the test failures somehow expected and safe to just ignore? Upstream issue tracker or discussion reference? Javadocs crosslink with online Java SE 6 javadocs. Would be better to crosslink with local java-javadoc. Ditto crosslinking with dependencies' javadocs, at least ant-javadoc and objectweb-asm-javadoc seem to be applicable ones, and there are probably more. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review