https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> --- (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5) > (In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #4) > > Summary and %description should say "Python 3" because this is Python 3 only. > > > > Summary and %description for the binary package should probably say "Python > > %{python3_version}" instead of "Python 3". > > The name of the package "python3X-setuptools" will be displayed next to > summaries and description Really, everywhere? > and I think makes this point. By that argument you could leave the words python and setuptools out of the summary and description as well. It wouldn't be a good idea to do that either, just like it is not a good idea to knowingly leave inaccurate and possibly misleading versioning information there that would be very easy to fix. I won't block the review because of this, but I suggest you reconsider. > > Rest of the docs would be better installed as "%doc docs/*" to avoid one > > unnecessary dir. > > Fixed. Makefile and conf.py in docs don't seem useful, I suggest removing them before the first build. Accepted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review